mouse anti flag rbitc Search Results


96
Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank mouse monoclonal anti a5 antibody
Mouse Monoclonal Anti A5 Antibody, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti a5 antibody/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti a5 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Novus Biologicals polyclonal hrp-coupled anti-mouse igg secondary antibody
Polyclonal Hrp Coupled Anti Mouse Igg Secondary Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/polyclonal hrp-coupled anti-mouse igg secondary antibody/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyclonal hrp-coupled anti-mouse igg secondary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Millipore mouse anti-digoxigenin di-3 22
Mouse Anti Digoxigenin Di 3 22, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-digoxigenin di-3 22/product/Millipore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti-digoxigenin di-3 22 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti caspase 3
Anti Caspase 3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti caspase 3/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti caspase 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech antibodies anti trpc5
Fig. 2. Effect of the <t>TRPC5</t> activator AM237 on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced relaxation and contraction in the normal-fat diet (NFD) mouse aorta. (a) TRPC5 protein expression in mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAoECs) from NFD ( n = 10) and high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese ( n = 11) mice. (b) Co-immunostaining of TRPC5 and CD31 in mouse aortic rings (scale bar, 50 𝜇m). (c–e) Representative traces (c) and summary data (d, e) of phenylephrine (Phe)-precontracted ACh-induced relaxation followed by contraction at high concentrations in NFD ( n = 7) and AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 6) aortas. (f–h) Original recordings (f) and data summary (g, h) showing the effect of AM237 (100 nmol/L) on ACh-induced contraction in the NFD aorta with or without endothelium ( + endo CTL, n = 5; + endo AM237, n = 5; –endo CTL, n = 4; –endo AM237, n = 4). Mean ± SEM; A, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; d, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs NFD, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; e, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs CTL, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; g, ∗ P < 0.05 vs + endo CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; h, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test.
Antibodies Anti Trpc5, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies anti trpc5/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies anti trpc5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson rat anti-mouse e-selectin
Fig. 2. Effect of the <t>TRPC5</t> activator AM237 on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced relaxation and contraction in the normal-fat diet (NFD) mouse aorta. (a) TRPC5 protein expression in mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAoECs) from NFD ( n = 10) and high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese ( n = 11) mice. (b) Co-immunostaining of TRPC5 and CD31 in mouse aortic rings (scale bar, 50 𝜇m). (c–e) Representative traces (c) and summary data (d, e) of phenylephrine (Phe)-precontracted ACh-induced relaxation followed by contraction at high concentrations in NFD ( n = 7) and AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 6) aortas. (f–h) Original recordings (f) and data summary (g, h) showing the effect of AM237 (100 nmol/L) on ACh-induced contraction in the NFD aorta with or without endothelium ( + endo CTL, n = 5; + endo AM237, n = 5; –endo CTL, n = 4; –endo AM237, n = 4). Mean ± SEM; A, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; d, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs NFD, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; e, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs CTL, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; g, ∗ P < 0.05 vs + endo CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; h, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test.
Rat Anti Mouse E Selectin, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat anti-mouse e-selectin/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti-mouse e-selectin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal antibodies anti аβ42
Fig. 4. Scatter plots of (a) calculated FliC levels against predicted FliC values, and (b) calculated DING proteins levels against predicted DING proteins levels, as analyzed by multivariable regression analysis. The graphs given represent the best-achieved models for the prediction of actual FliC and DING levels in CSF of all the donors enlisted in the current study, as affected by the levels of inflammatory markers COX-1 and COX-2, AD-related biomarkers <t>Аβ42</t> and tau, and the microbial markers (a) DING or (b) FliC. Multilinear analysis was performed with the process of stepwise elimination, to evaluate the individual effect of the aforementioned markers. The calculated R squared values of the best-achieved models, their respective p values, and equations are provided in the respective plot. Statistical analysis was carried out by employing Graph Pad Prism 8.0 statistical software.
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies Anti аβ42, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibodies anti аβ42/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal antibodies anti аβ42 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech rabbit anti claudin 1
Fig. 4. Scatter plots of (a) calculated FliC levels against predicted FliC values, and (b) calculated DING proteins levels against predicted DING proteins levels, as analyzed by multivariable regression analysis. The graphs given represent the best-achieved models for the prediction of actual FliC and DING levels in CSF of all the donors enlisted in the current study, as affected by the levels of inflammatory markers COX-1 and COX-2, AD-related biomarkers <t>Аβ42</t> and tau, and the microbial markers (a) DING or (b) FliC. Multilinear analysis was performed with the process of stepwise elimination, to evaluate the individual effect of the aforementioned markers. The calculated R squared values of the best-achieved models, their respective p values, and equations are provided in the respective plot. Statistical analysis was carried out by employing Graph Pad Prism 8.0 statistical software.
Rabbit Anti Claudin 1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti claudin 1/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti claudin 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Merck KGaA mouse anti-oxt (mab5296)
Fig. 4. Scatter plots of (a) calculated FliC levels against predicted FliC values, and (b) calculated DING proteins levels against predicted DING proteins levels, as analyzed by multivariable regression analysis. The graphs given represent the best-achieved models for the prediction of actual FliC and DING levels in CSF of all the donors enlisted in the current study, as affected by the levels of inflammatory markers COX-1 and COX-2, AD-related biomarkers <t>Аβ42</t> and tau, and the microbial markers (a) DING or (b) FliC. Multilinear analysis was performed with the process of stepwise elimination, to evaluate the individual effect of the aforementioned markers. The calculated R squared values of the best-achieved models, their respective p values, and equations are provided in the respective plot. Statistical analysis was carried out by employing Graph Pad Prism 8.0 statistical software.
Mouse Anti Oxt (Mab5296), supplied by Merck KGaA, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-oxt (mab5296)/product/Merck KGaA
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti-oxt (mab5296) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech rabbit anti cjun n terminal kinase jnk antibody
Fig. 4. Scatter plots of (a) calculated FliC levels against predicted FliC values, and (b) calculated DING proteins levels against predicted DING proteins levels, as analyzed by multivariable regression analysis. The graphs given represent the best-achieved models for the prediction of actual FliC and DING levels in CSF of all the donors enlisted in the current study, as affected by the levels of inflammatory markers COX-1 and COX-2, AD-related biomarkers <t>Аβ42</t> and tau, and the microbial markers (a) DING or (b) FliC. Multilinear analysis was performed with the process of stepwise elimination, to evaluate the individual effect of the aforementioned markers. The calculated R squared values of the best-achieved models, their respective p values, and equations are provided in the respective plot. Statistical analysis was carried out by employing Graph Pad Prism 8.0 statistical software.
Rabbit Anti Cjun N Terminal Kinase Jnk Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti cjun n terminal kinase jnk antibody/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti cjun n terminal kinase jnk antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit monoclonal anti gapdh
Fig. 4. Scatter plots of (a) calculated FliC levels against predicted FliC values, and (b) calculated DING proteins levels against predicted DING proteins levels, as analyzed by multivariable regression analysis. The graphs given represent the best-achieved models for the prediction of actual FliC and DING levels in CSF of all the donors enlisted in the current study, as affected by the levels of inflammatory markers COX-1 and COX-2, AD-related biomarkers <t>Аβ42</t> and tau, and the microbial markers (a) DING or (b) FliC. Multilinear analysis was performed with the process of stepwise elimination, to evaluate the individual effect of the aforementioned markers. The calculated R squared values of the best-achieved models, their respective p values, and equations are provided in the respective plot. Statistical analysis was carried out by employing Graph Pad Prism 8.0 statistical software.
Rabbit Monoclonal Anti Gapdh, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit monoclonal anti gapdh/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit monoclonal anti gapdh - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse anti o glcnac
Fig. 4. Scatter plots of (a) calculated FliC levels against predicted FliC values, and (b) calculated DING proteins levels against predicted DING proteins levels, as analyzed by multivariable regression analysis. The graphs given represent the best-achieved models for the prediction of actual FliC and DING levels in CSF of all the donors enlisted in the current study, as affected by the levels of inflammatory markers COX-1 and COX-2, AD-related biomarkers <t>Аβ42</t> and tau, and the microbial markers (a) DING or (b) FliC. Multilinear analysis was performed with the process of stepwise elimination, to evaluate the individual effect of the aforementioned markers. The calculated R squared values of the best-achieved models, their respective p values, and equations are provided in the respective plot. Statistical analysis was carried out by employing Graph Pad Prism 8.0 statistical software.
Mouse Anti O Glcnac, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti o glcnac/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti o glcnac - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 2. Effect of the TRPC5 activator AM237 on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced relaxation and contraction in the normal-fat diet (NFD) mouse aorta. (a) TRPC5 protein expression in mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAoECs) from NFD ( n = 10) and high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese ( n = 11) mice. (b) Co-immunostaining of TRPC5 and CD31 in mouse aortic rings (scale bar, 50 𝜇m). (c–e) Representative traces (c) and summary data (d, e) of phenylephrine (Phe)-precontracted ACh-induced relaxation followed by contraction at high concentrations in NFD ( n = 7) and AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 6) aortas. (f–h) Original recordings (f) and data summary (g, h) showing the effect of AM237 (100 nmol/L) on ACh-induced contraction in the NFD aorta with or without endothelium ( + endo CTL, n = 5; + endo AM237, n = 5; –endo CTL, n = 4; –endo AM237, n = 4). Mean ± SEM; A, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; d, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs NFD, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; e, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs CTL, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; g, ∗ P < 0.05 vs + endo CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; h, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test.

Journal: Fundamental Research

Article Title: TRPC5 is essential in endothelium-dependent contraction of aorta from diet-induced obese mice

doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.01.017

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2. Effect of the TRPC5 activator AM237 on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced relaxation and contraction in the normal-fat diet (NFD) mouse aorta. (a) TRPC5 protein expression in mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAoECs) from NFD ( n = 10) and high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese ( n = 11) mice. (b) Co-immunostaining of TRPC5 and CD31 in mouse aortic rings (scale bar, 50 𝜇m). (c–e) Representative traces (c) and summary data (d, e) of phenylephrine (Phe)-precontracted ACh-induced relaxation followed by contraction at high concentrations in NFD ( n = 7) and AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 6) aortas. (f–h) Original recordings (f) and data summary (g, h) showing the effect of AM237 (100 nmol/L) on ACh-induced contraction in the NFD aorta with or without endothelium ( + endo CTL, n = 5; + endo AM237, n = 5; –endo CTL, n = 4; –endo AM237, n = 4). Mean ± SEM; A, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; d, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs NFD, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; e, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs CTL, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; g, ∗ P < 0.05 vs + endo CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; h, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test.

Article Snippet: The membranes were incubated overnight t 4 °C with the primary antibodies anti-TRPC5 (1:200, Proteintech), nti-COX-1 (1:200, Abcam), anti-COX-2 (1:2000, Abcam), anti-cPLA 2 1:200, Santa Cruz), anti-p-cPLA 2 (1:1000, Signalway Antibody), and nti-GAPDH (1:1000, Santa Cruz) followed by horseradish peroxidaseonjugated secondary antibody (mouse, 1:10,000; rabbit, 1:5000, Beytime) at room temperature for 2 h. ImageJ was used for band intensity nalysis.

Techniques: Expressing, Immunostaining, Two Tailed Test

Fig. 3. Effect of TRPC5 inhibition on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced vaso- constriction in the high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mouse aorta. (a, b) Representative traces (a) and data summary (b) showing ACh-induced contrac- tion is attenuated by the TRPC5 inhibitor clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L), knockout of TRPC5, and the removal of endothelium (CTL, n = 5; clemizole, n = 6; TRPC5 − / − , n = 5; CTL(–Endo), n = 6; mean ± SEM; b, left, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; right, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test).

Journal: Fundamental Research

Article Title: TRPC5 is essential in endothelium-dependent contraction of aorta from diet-induced obese mice

doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.01.017

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3. Effect of TRPC5 inhibition on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced vaso- constriction in the high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mouse aorta. (a, b) Representative traces (a) and data summary (b) showing ACh-induced contrac- tion is attenuated by the TRPC5 inhibitor clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L), knockout of TRPC5, and the removal of endothelium (CTL, n = 5; clemizole, n = 6; TRPC5 − / − , n = 5; CTL(–Endo), n = 6; mean ± SEM; b, left, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test; right, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test).

Article Snippet: The membranes were incubated overnight t 4 °C with the primary antibodies anti-TRPC5 (1:200, Proteintech), nti-COX-1 (1:200, Abcam), anti-COX-2 (1:2000, Abcam), anti-cPLA 2 1:200, Santa Cruz), anti-p-cPLA 2 (1:1000, Signalway Antibody), and nti-GAPDH (1:1000, Santa Cruz) followed by horseradish peroxidaseonjugated secondary antibody (mouse, 1:10,000; rabbit, 1:5000, Beytime) at room temperature for 2 h. ImageJ was used for band intensity nalysis.

Techniques: Inhibition, Knock-Out

Fig. 4. TRPC5 regulates contractions via cytosolic phospholipase A 2 (cPLA 2 ) in the high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mouse aorta. (a) Western blots and analysis of cPLA 2 and phosphorylated cPLA 2 (p-cPLA 2 ) expression in normal-fat diet (NFD, n = 15), AM237 (100 nmol/L)-treated NFD ( n = 9), HFD-induced obese ( n = 14), clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L)-treated HFD ( n = 7), and TRPC5 − / − -HFD ( n = 5) mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAoECs). (b) Dose-dependent effect of AM237 on p-cPLA 2 levels in NFD MAoECs. AM237 (nmol/L), 0, n = 16; 50, n = 11; 100, n = 16; 200, n = 10. (c) Dose-dependent effect of clemizole on p-cPLA 2 levels in HFD MAoECs ( n = 5). (d) Representative fluorescence images of the Bis-BODIPY TM FL C 11 -PC stained en-face aorta and analysis of PLA 2 activity in endothelial cells of the NFD ( n = 9), AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 7), HFD ( n = 17), clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L)-treated HFD ( n = 9), and TRPC5 − / − HFD ( n = 12) mouse aorta (scale bars, 10 𝜇m). (e) Acetylcholine (ACh)-induced contraction in HFD ( n = 4) and MAFP (10 𝜇mol/L)-treated HFD ( n = 6) mouse aortic rings. (f) ACh-induced contraction in the NFD ( n = 5), AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 5), and AM237 (100 nmol/L) + MAFP (30 𝜇mol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 6) mouse aorta. Mean ± SEM; a, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, # P < 0.05 vs HFD, NS, no significant difference, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc non-parametric test (p-cPLA 2 ) and one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (cPLA 2 ); b, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs no AM237, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test; c, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs no clemizole, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test; d, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, # P < 0.05 vs HFD, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test; e, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (left) and Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test (right); f, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (left) and one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (right).

Journal: Fundamental Research

Article Title: TRPC5 is essential in endothelium-dependent contraction of aorta from diet-induced obese mice

doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.01.017

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4. TRPC5 regulates contractions via cytosolic phospholipase A 2 (cPLA 2 ) in the high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mouse aorta. (a) Western blots and analysis of cPLA 2 and phosphorylated cPLA 2 (p-cPLA 2 ) expression in normal-fat diet (NFD, n = 15), AM237 (100 nmol/L)-treated NFD ( n = 9), HFD-induced obese ( n = 14), clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L)-treated HFD ( n = 7), and TRPC5 − / − -HFD ( n = 5) mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAoECs). (b) Dose-dependent effect of AM237 on p-cPLA 2 levels in NFD MAoECs. AM237 (nmol/L), 0, n = 16; 50, n = 11; 100, n = 16; 200, n = 10. (c) Dose-dependent effect of clemizole on p-cPLA 2 levels in HFD MAoECs ( n = 5). (d) Representative fluorescence images of the Bis-BODIPY TM FL C 11 -PC stained en-face aorta and analysis of PLA 2 activity in endothelial cells of the NFD ( n = 9), AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 7), HFD ( n = 17), clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L)-treated HFD ( n = 9), and TRPC5 − / − HFD ( n = 12) mouse aorta (scale bars, 10 𝜇m). (e) Acetylcholine (ACh)-induced contraction in HFD ( n = 4) and MAFP (10 𝜇mol/L)-treated HFD ( n = 6) mouse aortic rings. (f) ACh-induced contraction in the NFD ( n = 5), AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 5), and AM237 (100 nmol/L) + MAFP (30 𝜇mol/L)-pretreated NFD ( n = 6) mouse aorta. Mean ± SEM; a, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, # P < 0.05 vs HFD, NS, no significant difference, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc non-parametric test (p-cPLA 2 ) and one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (cPLA 2 ); b, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs no AM237, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test; c, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs no clemizole, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test; d, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, # P < 0.05 vs HFD, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test; e, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (left) and Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test (right); f, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (left) and one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (right).

Article Snippet: The membranes were incubated overnight t 4 °C with the primary antibodies anti-TRPC5 (1:200, Proteintech), nti-COX-1 (1:200, Abcam), anti-COX-2 (1:2000, Abcam), anti-cPLA 2 1:200, Santa Cruz), anti-p-cPLA 2 (1:1000, Signalway Antibody), and nti-GAPDH (1:1000, Santa Cruz) followed by horseradish peroxidaseonjugated secondary antibody (mouse, 1:10,000; rabbit, 1:5000, Beytime) at room temperature for 2 h. ImageJ was used for band intensity nalysis.

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Staining, Activity Assay, Two Tailed Test

Fig. 6. Role of COX-2 in TRPC5-regulated vasoconstriction in the mouse aorta. (a) Western blots and analysis of COX-1 and COX-2 expression in normal-fat diet (NFD, n = 5), AM237 (100 nmol/L) pre-treated NFD ( n = 5), high-fat diet (HFD, n = 5), clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L) pre-treated HFD ( n = 5), and TRPC5 − / − HFD ( n = 5) mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAoECs). (b) Effect of the COX inhibitors NS-398 (3 𝜇mol/L) ( n = 5), VAS-2870 (30 𝜇mol/L) ( n = 3), and indomethacin (indo, 1 𝜇mol/L, n = 3) on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced contraction in the HFD mouse aorta (CTL, n = 3). (c) Effect of the COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 (3 𝜇mol/L) on ACh-induced contraction in the AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD mouse aorta (CTL, n = 5; AM237, n = 7; AM237 + NS-398, n = 7). Mean ± SEM; a, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, # P < 0.05 vs HFD, NS, no significant difference, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc non-parametric test (COX-1) and one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (COX-2); b, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (left) and one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (right); c, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (left) and one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (right) .

Journal: Fundamental Research

Article Title: TRPC5 is essential in endothelium-dependent contraction of aorta from diet-induced obese mice

doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.01.017

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 6. Role of COX-2 in TRPC5-regulated vasoconstriction in the mouse aorta. (a) Western blots and analysis of COX-1 and COX-2 expression in normal-fat diet (NFD, n = 5), AM237 (100 nmol/L) pre-treated NFD ( n = 5), high-fat diet (HFD, n = 5), clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L) pre-treated HFD ( n = 5), and TRPC5 − / − HFD ( n = 5) mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAoECs). (b) Effect of the COX inhibitors NS-398 (3 𝜇mol/L) ( n = 5), VAS-2870 (30 𝜇mol/L) ( n = 3), and indomethacin (indo, 1 𝜇mol/L, n = 3) on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced contraction in the HFD mouse aorta (CTL, n = 3). (c) Effect of the COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 (3 𝜇mol/L) on ACh-induced contraction in the AM237 (100 nmol/L)-pretreated NFD mouse aorta (CTL, n = 5; AM237, n = 7; AM237 + NS-398, n = 7). Mean ± SEM; a, ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, # P < 0.05 vs HFD, NS, no significant difference, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc non-parametric test (COX-1) and one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (COX-2); b, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs CTL, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (left) and one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (right); c, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (left) and one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (right) .

Article Snippet: The membranes were incubated overnight t 4 °C with the primary antibodies anti-TRPC5 (1:200, Proteintech), nti-COX-1 (1:200, Abcam), anti-COX-2 (1:2000, Abcam), anti-cPLA 2 1:200, Santa Cruz), anti-p-cPLA 2 (1:1000, Signalway Antibody), and nti-GAPDH (1:1000, Santa Cruz) followed by horseradish peroxidaseonjugated secondary antibody (mouse, 1:10,000; rabbit, 1:5000, Beytime) at room temperature for 2 h. ImageJ was used for band intensity nalysis.

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing

Fig. 5. TRPC5 contributes to acetylcholine (ACh)-induced Ca 2+ entry into endothelial cells of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mouse aortas. (a, b) Representative traces (a) and data summary (b) showing an ACh (10 𝜇mol/L)- induced [Ca 2 + ] i rise in aortic endothelial cells from normal-fat diet (NFD) and HFD mice (NFD, n = 7; NFD-AM237 (100 nmol/L), n = 5; HFD, n = 5; HFD- clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L), n = 6; HFD-TRPC5 − / − , n = 6; mean ± SEM; ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, # P < 0.05 vs HFD, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple com- parisons test).

Journal: Fundamental Research

Article Title: TRPC5 is essential in endothelium-dependent contraction of aorta from diet-induced obese mice

doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.01.017

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 5. TRPC5 contributes to acetylcholine (ACh)-induced Ca 2+ entry into endothelial cells of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mouse aortas. (a, b) Representative traces (a) and data summary (b) showing an ACh (10 𝜇mol/L)- induced [Ca 2 + ] i rise in aortic endothelial cells from normal-fat diet (NFD) and HFD mice (NFD, n = 7; NFD-AM237 (100 nmol/L), n = 5; HFD, n = 5; HFD- clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L), n = 6; HFD-TRPC5 − / − , n = 6; mean ± SEM; ∗ P < 0.05 vs NFD, # P < 0.05 vs HFD, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple com- parisons test).

Article Snippet: The membranes were incubated overnight t 4 °C with the primary antibodies anti-TRPC5 (1:200, Proteintech), nti-COX-1 (1:200, Abcam), anti-COX-2 (1:2000, Abcam), anti-cPLA 2 1:200, Santa Cruz), anti-p-cPLA 2 (1:1000, Signalway Antibody), and nti-GAPDH (1:1000, Santa Cruz) followed by horseradish peroxidaseonjugated secondary antibody (mouse, 1:10,000; rabbit, 1:5000, Beytime) at room temperature for 2 h. ImageJ was used for band intensity nalysis.

Techniques:

Fig. 7. PGF 2 𝜶and PGE 2 are involved in TRPC5-related contraction in the high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mouse aorta. (a) Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) showing the PGF 2 𝛼( n = 7), PGE 2 ( n = 7), PGD 2 ( n = 5), PGI 2 ( n = 5), and 8-isoprostanes ( n = 6) levels in normal-fat diet (NFD) and HFD mouse aortic rings after exposure to acetylcholine (ACh, 10 𝜇mol/L). (b) Effect of clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L), MAFP (10 𝜇mol/L), NS-398 (3 𝜇mol/L), –endo, and knockout of TRPC5 − / − on ACh-induced PGF 2 𝛼and PGE 2 release in the ACh-stimulated HFD mouse aorta (PGF 2 𝛼, CTL, n = 7; clemizole, n = 5; TRPC5 − / − , n = 5; MAFP, n = 6; NS-398, n = 6; –endo, n = 6; PGE 2 , CTL, n = 7; clemizole, n = 5; TRPC5 − / − , n = 5; MAFP, n = 5; NS-398, n = 5; –endo, n = 5; (c) Effects of AM237 (100 nmol/L), MAFP (10 𝜇mol/L), and NS-398 (3 𝜇mol/L) treatment and the removal of endothelium (–Endo) on EIA for PGF 2 𝛼and PGE 2 in the NFD mouse aorta stimulated with ACh (10 𝜇mol/L) (PGF 2 𝛼, CTL, n = 7; AM237, n = 4; MAFP, n = 6; NS-398, n = 4; –endo, n = 4; PGE 2 , CTL, n = 10; AM237, n = 5; MAFP, n = 5; NS-398, n = 5; –endo, n = 7). (d) Schematic of the mechanism of TRPC5 regulation of endothelium-dependent contraction in the DIO mouse aorta. Mean ± SEM; a, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs NFD, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; b, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test; c, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237 group, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test.

Journal: Fundamental Research

Article Title: TRPC5 is essential in endothelium-dependent contraction of aorta from diet-induced obese mice

doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.01.017

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 7. PGF 2 𝜶and PGE 2 are involved in TRPC5-related contraction in the high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mouse aorta. (a) Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) showing the PGF 2 𝛼( n = 7), PGE 2 ( n = 7), PGD 2 ( n = 5), PGI 2 ( n = 5), and 8-isoprostanes ( n = 6) levels in normal-fat diet (NFD) and HFD mouse aortic rings after exposure to acetylcholine (ACh, 10 𝜇mol/L). (b) Effect of clemizole (20 𝜇mol/L), MAFP (10 𝜇mol/L), NS-398 (3 𝜇mol/L), –endo, and knockout of TRPC5 − / − on ACh-induced PGF 2 𝛼and PGE 2 release in the ACh-stimulated HFD mouse aorta (PGF 2 𝛼, CTL, n = 7; clemizole, n = 5; TRPC5 − / − , n = 5; MAFP, n = 6; NS-398, n = 6; –endo, n = 6; PGE 2 , CTL, n = 7; clemizole, n = 5; TRPC5 − / − , n = 5; MAFP, n = 5; NS-398, n = 5; –endo, n = 5; (c) Effects of AM237 (100 nmol/L), MAFP (10 𝜇mol/L), and NS-398 (3 𝜇mol/L) treatment and the removal of endothelium (–Endo) on EIA for PGF 2 𝛼and PGE 2 in the NFD mouse aorta stimulated with ACh (10 𝜇mol/L) (PGF 2 𝛼, CTL, n = 7; AM237, n = 4; MAFP, n = 6; NS-398, n = 4; –endo, n = 4; PGE 2 , CTL, n = 10; AM237, n = 5; MAFP, n = 5; NS-398, n = 5; –endo, n = 7). (d) Schematic of the mechanism of TRPC5 regulation of endothelium-dependent contraction in the DIO mouse aorta. Mean ± SEM; a, ∗ P < 0.05, NS, no significant difference vs NFD, Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test; b, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test; c, ∗ P < 0.05 vs CTL, # P < 0.05 vs AM237 group, one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test.

Article Snippet: The membranes were incubated overnight t 4 °C with the primary antibodies anti-TRPC5 (1:200, Proteintech), nti-COX-1 (1:200, Abcam), anti-COX-2 (1:2000, Abcam), anti-cPLA 2 1:200, Santa Cruz), anti-p-cPLA 2 (1:1000, Signalway Antibody), and nti-GAPDH (1:1000, Santa Cruz) followed by horseradish peroxidaseonjugated secondary antibody (mouse, 1:10,000; rabbit, 1:5000, Beytime) at room temperature for 2 h. ImageJ was used for band intensity nalysis.

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Knock-Out, Two Tailed Test

Fig. 4. Scatter plots of (a) calculated FliC levels against predicted FliC values, and (b) calculated DING proteins levels against predicted DING proteins levels, as analyzed by multivariable regression analysis. The graphs given represent the best-achieved models for the prediction of actual FliC and DING levels in CSF of all the donors enlisted in the current study, as affected by the levels of inflammatory markers COX-1 and COX-2, AD-related biomarkers Аβ42 and tau, and the microbial markers (a) DING or (b) FliC. Multilinear analysis was performed with the process of stepwise elimination, to evaluate the individual effect of the aforementioned markers. The calculated R squared values of the best-achieved models, their respective p values, and equations are provided in the respective plot. Statistical analysis was carried out by employing Graph Pad Prism 8.0 statistical software.

Journal: Brain Disorders

Article Title: Investigation for the involvement of microbial FliC and DING proteins in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment and correlation with neurodegeneration and inflammation markers

doi: 10.1016/j.dscb.2023.100091

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4. Scatter plots of (a) calculated FliC levels against predicted FliC values, and (b) calculated DING proteins levels against predicted DING proteins levels, as analyzed by multivariable regression analysis. The graphs given represent the best-achieved models for the prediction of actual FliC and DING levels in CSF of all the donors enlisted in the current study, as affected by the levels of inflammatory markers COX-1 and COX-2, AD-related biomarkers Аβ42 and tau, and the microbial markers (a) DING or (b) FliC. Multilinear analysis was performed with the process of stepwise elimination, to evaluate the individual effect of the aforementioned markers. The calculated R squared values of the best-achieved models, their respective p values, and equations are provided in the respective plot. Statistical analysis was carried out by employing Graph Pad Prism 8.0 statistical software.

Article Snippet: Аnti-COX-1 (#160,108) and COX-2 (#160,107) rabbit polyclonal antibodies were from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA), while mouse monoclonal antibodies Anti-Аβ42 (#sc-28,365) and anti-tau (#AHB0042), were purchased from Santa Cruz (Dallas, TX, USA) and Invitrogen (Waltham, MA, USA), respectively.

Techniques: Software